The Accountable Care Organization (“ACO”) final rules show that comments to CMS really do make a difference. The public outcry against the 65 quality measures proposed in the spring led to CMS’ 50% cut of the number quality measures. Along with the large cut, CMS explained its plan for allowing ACOs to meet the measure requirements by reporting on the measures in the first year and receiving “pay for performance” in the following years based on the weighted scores received in each quality measure.
The revised list of quality measures are broken out into 33 different measures (predominately with NQF measure numbers) with four umbrella categories and five subcategories as follows:
- Patient/Caregiver Experience (7 measures)
- Care Coordination/Patient Safety (6 measures, includes the EHR Incentive Program)
- Preventative Health (8 measures)
- At Risk Population (12 measures)
- Diabetes (6 measures)
- Hypertension (1 measure)
- Ischemic vascular disease (2 measures)
- Heart failure (1 measure)
- Coronary Artery Disease (2 measures)
The tables provided in the final rule at pages 67889-90 are particularly helpful in visually identifying the measures, the method of data submission and whether the particular measure is pay for reporting or pay for performance. The measures will be submitted to CMS through either surveys (for patient/caregiver experience measures), claims, the EHR Incentive Program, or the Group Practice Reporting Option (“GPRO”) Web Interface. The surveys will be conducted using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (“CAHPS”) surveys for 2012 and 2013, in future years, ACOs will have to select a CMS approved vendor to administer the surveys.
EHR Incentive Program
One of the significant changes to the quality measures was the expansion of the EHR incentive program related measure. The quality measure no longer requires that 50% of the primary care providers to achieve meaningful use in order for the ACO to participate. The EHR quality measure now recognizes those participating in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program do not have to meet meaningful use requirements in their first year of participation. As such, the new measure now includes primary care providers that successfully qualify for the EHR Incentive Program under either Medicare or Medicaid. In addition, CMS cut previously proposed measures that were redundant with the EHR Incentive Program such as the measure concerning clinical decision support and electronic prescribing.
CMS still emphasizes the importance of the usage of the EHR technology by giving the EHR quality measure a higher weight. Eligible professionals participating in ACOs are still eligible to separately participate in the EHR Incentive Programs or the e-prescribing incentive program.
Pay for Reporting vs. Pay for Performance
In the first year of participation, all of the quality measures may be satisfied by merely reporting on the quality measures. For pay for reporting, ACOs will earn the maximum sharing rate for complete and accurate reporting of 100% of the required data, and no quality threshold must be met. In the second year, 25 of the quality measures will be pay for performance, and eight will continue to be pay for reporting. In the third year, all but one quality measure will be on a pay for performance basis.
In the pay for performance years, each domain will be given equal weight of 25% in the calculation of the ACOs overall quality performance score. Each of the individual measures will be equally weighted within the domains, except for the EHR Incentive Program quality measure which is double weighted. ACOs must minimally attain 30% (or be in the national 30th percentile) for that quality measure. Subregulatory guidance will indicate the quality performance rates an ACO needs to achieve in order to earn the maximum quality points in a domain.
Recognizing that meeting all 33 measures in a given year may be difficult, CMS is requiring that ACOs achieve the quality performance standards on 70% of the measures in each domain. Failure to achieve the 70% standard will result in a corrective action plan and re-evaluation in the final year. However, if an ACO scores a zero for an entire measure, it will not be able to share in the savings generated. Due to the double weight of the EHR measure, failure to meet the EHR measure in the Care Coordination domain would cause the ACO to miss the 70% cut-off.
Reporting Calendar & PQRS
ACOs are expected to report on the quality measures on a calendar year basis, beginning with the reporting period starting January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. Even though a “performance year” in the regulations may begin in April or July of 2012 and end in December 2013, the quality performance for the first performance year will be based on reporting of the measures from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013. Eligible professionals participating in an ACO that start the agreement in April or July of 2012 will also qualify for the 2012 PQRS incentive under the Shared Savings program by reporting the ACO GPRO measures for the full 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (“PQRS”) calendar year reporting period.
Note that ACO participant entities that want to qualify for PQRS must participate as group practices and not separately participate or earn a PQRS incentive outside of the Shared Savings Program. Individual ACO providers may not seek to qualify for the individual PQRS incentive under the traditional PQRS plans. CMS also relaxed its requirements regarding the PQRS incentives. If an ACO fails to meet the Shared Savings Program quality performance measures and therefore is not eligible for shared savings, the participating entities may still be eligible to receive the PQRS incentive under the Shared Savings Program.
More Updates Coming
ACO participants should keep an eye out for subregulatory guidance which will detail the annual measure specifications. CMS plans on releasing specifications in December and in the first quarter of 2012.
For more information regarding the ACO quality measures or ACOs in general, please contact Elana Zana.