For those hospitals interested in applying for the Medicare EHR Incentive Payments for 2011, the last day to begin the 90-day reporting period is July 3rd. Hospitals and CAHs must demonstrate meaningful use for 90-days during the 2011 fiscal year (which ends September 30, 2011). Hospitals and CAHs have until November 30, 2011 to register and attest to meaningful use.
CMS Issues Medicare EHR Incentive Checks
Beginning this week, CMS will begin issuing Medicare EHR Incentive Payments to those providers who have successfully attested to meeting meaningful use. Eligible Professionals who have met the meaningful use requirements can expect payment of $18,000. (Note, Eligible Professionals that have not yet met the $24,000 Medicare allowed charges threshold will not receive a check until that threshold is met). Eligible Hospitals that have attested to meaningful use can also begin to expect their incentive payments.
CMS will issue incentive payments in the same manner as providers receive payments for Medicare services, via electronic funds transfer or check. Payments will be made to the TIN selected during registration for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program.
For those providers who have not yet registered for the EHR Incentive Program there is still plenty of time in 2011 to do so. The Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs have launched in some states, with other expecting to launch later this Summer.
For assistance with registering for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program or understanding meaningful use please contact Elana Zana.
Attestation for EHR Incentive Programs Available
Earlier this month, CMS launched the attestation portion of the EHR Incentive Payment Program. Beginning on April 18th, eligible professionals and hospitals are now able to attest to meaningful use (or adopt, implement or upgrade for Medicaid). Along with the attestation itself, CMS launched its Meaningful Use Attestation Calculator, a wizard which walks eligible professionals and hospitals through the meaningful use objectives and enables the entity to determine if it can successfully meet the meaningful use standards prior to filling out the registration form.
For those providers that are able to begin the registration and attestation process, access to registration and attestation is available here. The CMS website also has a user guide that is helpful when registering as well as FAQs. To be eligible for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs an eligible professional or hospital must be using certified EHR technology. The ONC provides a list of which EHR systems are “certified.”
In addition, CMS is offering teleconferences regarding registration and attestation:
- Tuesday, May 3, 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. ET – Register to join this call if you are an eligible hospital or CAH who wants to learn more about the attestation process for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program.
- Thursday, May 5, 1:30 – 3:00 p.m. ET- Register to join this call if you are an EP who wants to learn more about the attestation process for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program.
Some states are also offering webinars about the Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program and how to register. Registration for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program requires both registration with CMS and on the state level. However, eligible professionals and hospitals will not be able to register with CMS for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program until their state is ready to start its Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Washington expects to go-live in June 2010; California plans to go-live this Summer for eligible professionals.
If you have questions regarding the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs or would like some assistance with understanding meaningful use or calculating patient volume (Medicaid) please contact Elana Zana or Dave Schoolcraft.
CMS Releases Proposed Rules for Accountable Care Organizations
On March 31, 2011, CMS released its proposed rules for public review and comment relating to Medicare payments for health care providers participating in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Under the proposed rules, health care providers participating in ACOs would be eligible to receive additional Medicare payments based on meeting certain specified quality and savings requirements in addition to receiving traditional Medicare fee-for-service payments under Medicare Parts A and B.
The proposed rules are available here and will be published in the Federal Register on April 7, 2011. A fact sheet published by CMS which provides a summary of proposed rules is available here. If you would like further information about ACOs, please contact Dave Schoolcraft or Elana Zana.
Registration for Medicare EHR Incentive Payments Starts January 3rd
Starting on January 3rd, 2011, registration for the HITECH Electronic Health Record Medicare Incentive Payments will open. This registration is available for both eligible professionals and eligible hospitals, including Critical Access Hospitals. The registration link will be available starting on January 3rd and can be accessed here. Registration for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments will be available for the following states: Alaska, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. In February, registration will likely open in California, Missouri, and North Dakota. It is anticipated that other states, including Washington, will launch their Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs during the spring and summer of 2011.
For mor information regarding the Medicare Incentive Payments see the CMS press release. For a general overview of the HITECH incentive payments please read our previous blog posts for physicians and hospitals. As a disclaimer, these blog posts were written prior to the issuance of the Final Rules but provide a good overview of the statutory requirements.
CMS has also issued tip sheet regarding Stage 1 Meaningful Use for hospitals, and Critical Access Hospitals, click here to access the tip sheet. The tip sheet for eligible professionals can be accessed here. Additional information may be obtained by contacting CMS or your State directly (CMS and State Medicaid Contact List & Information).
If you would like further information regarding achieving Meaningful Use, registering for the Medicare Incentive Payments, or assistance calculating the Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments please contact Dave Schoolcraft or Elana Zana.
New CMS Rules Require Equal Visitation Rights
The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued new rules today that require participating hospitals to have policies that allow patients to choose the visitors who are allowed by their bedside, including same-sex domestic partners.
According to the White House’s press release, the new rules will:
- Require hospitals to explain to all patients their right to choose who may visit them during their inpatient stay, regardless of whether the visitor is a family member, a spouse, a domestic partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), or other type of visitor, as well as their right to withdraw such consent to visitation at any time.
- Require hospitals have written policies and procedures detailing patients’ visitation rights, as well as the circumstances under which the hospitals may restrict patient access to visitors based on reasonable clinical needs.
- Specify that all visitors chosen by the patient must be able to enjoy “full and equal” visitation privileges consistent with the wishes of the patient.
- Update the Conditions of Participation (CoPs), which are the health and safety standards all Medicare- and Medicaid-participating hospitals and critical access hospitals must meet, and are applicable to all patients of those hospitals regardless of payer source.
The rules will take effect 60 days after publication. The new rules can be found here.
CMS Releases Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol
On September 23, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted on its web site the long awaited voluntary “Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol” which it refers to as the “SRDP.” Information about the SRDP is available on the CMS website, and the SRDP is available here.
In March 2010, Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (sometimes referred to as the “PPACA” or “ACA”). Section 6409 of the ACA required CMS to promulgate a Stark law self-disclosure program by September 23, 2010, which it has now done. CMS intentionally decided to establish the SRDP without going through rule making. While it is good news that there exists a formal mechanism for resolving Stark law violations, the SRDP raises as many questions as it answers. Important aspects of the SRDP include the following:
- The SRDP is separate from the advisory opinion process and cannot be used to obtain a CMS determination about an actual or potential violation;
- CMS makes no guaranty about the treatment a disclosing party will receive, i.e., that overpayment amounts will be compromised in any particular manner or at all;
- CMS will coordinate disclosures it receives with the DHHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Dept. of Justice (DOJ) as appropriate;
- The disclosure must be comprehensive, address all of the elements set forth in SRDP, and include a comprehensive financial analysis;
- Disclosures made within 60 days of the overpayment being identified will suspend the obligation to return any overpayment until a settlement agreement is entered or the disclosure is removed from the SRDP;
- The disclosing party or an appropriate officer of the disclosing party must certify that the submission is truthful and based on a good faith effort to resolve any potential liabilities under the Stark law;
- CMS will verify the submission, including requesting additional information and requiring cooperation from the disclosing party to provide information that may be subject to the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges; and
- Repayment of any overpayment will not be accepted prior to CMS’s completion of its verification and inquiry.
Throughout the process, CMS will require the diligent and good faith cooperation of a disclosing party. Failure to provide cooperation will be considered by CMS as it assesses appropriate resolutions. If a disclosing party provides false or misleading information, or intentionally omits relevant information, CMS may refer the matter to the DOJ or other appropriate agencies. Disclosures must be made within 60 days of the date the original overpayment was identified, or the date any corresponding cost report is due, if applicable. Finally, CMS has set forth factors that it will consider in determining whether to reduce the amounts that would otherwise be owed. Again, CMS provides no guarantees, or even guidelines, for how it will determine appropriate resolutions. The factors CMS will consider include
- The nature and extent of the illegal or improper practice;
- The timeliness of the self-disclosure;
- The cooperation of the disclosing party in providing additional information;
- The litigation risk associated with the disclosure; and
- The financial position of the disclosing party.
Despite the request of various industry groups, CMS has made no explicit statements about how it will consider or treat disclosures of technical violations (e.g., missing signature, expired agreements, etc.). Ultimately, CMS states that it has “no obligation to reduce any amounts due and owing,” and that it will make determinations on an individual, facts and circumstances basis for each disclosure.
Having this avenue to attempt to resolve Stark law violations is indeed an improvement that has been needed for a long time. However, providers cannot take much comfort from CMS’s statement that it has no obligation under the SRDP to compromise amounts due. Only time and experience will tell how CMS treats these disclosures. Ultimately, if a disclosing party does not believe that it is receiving appropriate treatment, it appears that the party can remove itself from the SRDP; however, that is cold comfort after it has brought the matter to CMS’s attention and now has the obligation under the ACA to return overpayments.
For more information on the SRDP or the Stark law in general, please contact Don Black, Dave Schoolcraft or any one of OMW’s Healthcare Team members.
CMS Launches EHR Incentive Payment Website
To help answer questions regarding meaningful use and the EHR incentive payments, CMS has launched an EHR Incentive Program website. The website provides FAQ’s, CMS presentations, fact sheets, and more. To view the site click here.
CMS Presentation on Meaningful Use & EHR Incentives Final Rules
On July 13, CMS issued the Medicare and Medicaid Programs Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Final Rules. These final rules were published in the Federal Register on July 28th.
On July 22nd, CMS hosted a conference call to explain the changes in the Final Rules as compared to the Proposed Rules. Some key changes include:
- Inclusion of Critical Access Hospitals in the definition of eligible hospital for Medicaid incentives.
- A revised definition of hospital based eligible professionals to exclude only those physicians that provide 90% or more of their services in either an inpatient or emergency department.
- Eligible Professionals and Eligible Hospitals may defer 5 optional “menu set” Meaningful Use reporting objectives.
- Reduction in measure thresholds for Meaningful Use reporting objectives.
To view the CMS slide presentation click here. ONC has also published a slide deck entitled “Supporting Meaningful Use” that provides helpful guidance. CMS has also launched an EHR Incentives website which has fact sheets, press releases, general information, and instructions on how to participate, also on the website will be the transcript of the CMS conference call.
In addition, CMS has published the Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for EHR Technology. For more information on these Standards click here.
If you have questions regarding how these final rules will affect your practice please contact Elana Zana.
249 Members of Congress Urge CMS to Revise Meaningful Use and Incentive Eligibility
In a letter submitted to CMS on March 15th, Members of Congress encouraged CMS to revise its proposed definition of meaningful use and the restrictions on the EHR incentive payments. The letter covered three topics:
1) the definition of Meaningful Use;
2) the definition of Hospital-Based Physician; and
3) the limitation on payments to Multi-Campus hospitals.
Specifically, the letter discussed the application of the meaningful use requirements for both Medicare and Medicaid and urged CMS to relax the restrictions and the broad scope of the definition. The letter recommends that CMS modify the hospital-based definition to allow incentive payments for physicians that furnish services in hospital-owned ambulatory settings by excluding those physicians from the definition of hospital-based. Lastly, the letter requests that CMS identify hospitals as discrete facilities regardless of whether the hospital is part of a multi-hospital system operating under the same Medicare provider number.